Climate Activist - The Last Revolutionary?

Do climate activists represent the force which will bring about the last revolution in the current cycle? Like bourgeoisie who fought feudal system, communists who were bringing down bourgeois structures in early 20th century, and liberal democrats who participated in the destruction of the Eastern Bloc, climate activists in their revolutionary activity, on a more trivial level, seem to be ready for self-sacrifice which suggests that behind their activities stands something existentially real, rather than just a collection of intellectual constructions. They represent a logical next step in revolutionary movements, where in each step utopian ideas of greater and greater magnitude turn into the dystopia and yesterday’s revolutionary becomes a new updated bourgeois type who is targeted by the next step revolutionaries.

Like every revolutionary type, climate activist appeared in the absence of any narrative, and in particular, narrative which might be attractive to this human type. This absence of narratives is also acknowledged by Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum and dealing with it is one of the aspects of the Great Reset. This suggests that this upcoming revolution, like all previous ones, will partly be orchestrated by organized groups, like in this case WEF and related groups, who will use the momentum created by climate activists on the ground for much wider and large scale purposes. Climate activists are ready to disturb lives of consumer-bourgeoisie, commit light criminal acts, and be arrested for it. They show the same obsession, this time with climate change, like their communist and liberal democrat predecessors did in their time. Their number is growing exponentially, so it is not hard to see that they will be the ones, on the lower level, who will bring current consumer-bourgeois system down.

They are mostly made up of women and feminized men who activated their mother instincts for protecting the Mother Earth from climate change with apocalyptic scenarios in their minds if radical change is not made in people’s reliance on fossil fuels, deforestation and other issues related to climate change. Particularly young women might lead the way since they chronically lack their mother role due to the ongoing dissolution of the family. Climate activism attracts similar kinds of individuals as other kinds of left-wing activism of the 21 st century, so disdain for men, and in particular white men of today, is heavily present, which might be justified from traditionalist perspective due to the responsibility white man of non- noble race holds for a lot of destruction in the world during the last several hundred years. Given the predominant feminine factor they will stick very hard to their obsession, especially once it gets socially validated and becomes part of their identity, and whole generation of people will be drawn into these utopian ideas and in the process dismount the current consumer-bourgeois class from the position of pretended dominance. Religiously following science and elevating the status of a scientist is also part of this outlook, although not all leading scientists approve of the official stance on climate change. Since all of these developments will lead to the greatest dystopia the world has ever seen, this will be the end of science as it was known in the last several hundred years.

Typical member of the consumer-bourgeois society is basically helpless against these forces. He is trapped because he is democratically minded and heavily dependent on the system the way it functions for the last 50-70 years, so he on the one hand cannot really fight peaceful demonstrations of climate activists, and on the other is horrified imagining what would his life look like if the system stops working the way it has been for few decades. Climate activists will certainly win in this “fight”, but are very unaware of the possibility of climate crisis narrative being just a cover-up for global bankruptcy, and the real goals of the Great Reset which is making everybody happy without owning anything. They will use their temporary obsession to execute a revolution, but many will probably regret their actions after they see what they have done – gave the final blow to the system which is not sustainable, but which gave them ability to survive for some time. One of the main rationale of climate action is creating better future for children, which consumer-bourgeois man will find very difficult to oppose because of his obsession with protecting and even elevating children as something superior to adults. Other “under- privileged” groups of individuals, like people from the 3 rd world, women and all sorts of minorities, in typical style of previous revolutionaries, will be brought up as victims of climate change.

Main illusion of climate activism is that the “developed” countries are actually developed, and especially that they are rich – in reality they are all broke, so there is no possibility for replacing fossil fuels with renewables. People in general, as a result of this ongoing revolution might become less materialistic, but primarily because there would be nothing to consume, not because they are able to restrain themselves all of a sudden after being used to over-consuming for decades. Climate action assumes that for the current system it is just a matter of “transition” to reach new heights of the new system. Rhetoric which dominates is very similar to the one communists used during the 1980s when it became clear that the only path forward for the Eastern Bloc countries is a system of capitalist liberal democracy. This “transition” was a cover-up for the bankruptcy, both material and spiritual, of that system, so the same tactic might be used in this new “transition” but with a difference that no place exists where one might transition to, especially if one of the requirements, as is usually implicitly assumed, is higher standard of living. Generally climate action will be approached like a diet plan where initially it might have some momentum, but when the reality strikes, falling back to fossil fuels will be done with all of the consequences of the illusion which climate change narrative is full of. This is not surprising since the whole narrative has predominantly feminine nature. It would be interesting to see to what extent will the consumer- bourgeois man be able to alter his deeply ingrained habits in order to “save the planet”. His response to the recent crisis of 2020s teaches us that he will do anything to avoid discomfort, so he will probably treat “climate action” the same way, like another task in the inbox, trying to get rid of it as soon as possible. But this time he will have very hard time to stay comfortable and alive, since dealing with the pain cannot be avoided for too long.

Climate action and trans-humanism converge since they both imagine “a new human”, but given tendencies of both, most people living today might not be able to qualify for the participation in the future they imagine. Although not yet explicitly stated, climate activists consider people, and in particular “Western” people, responsible for all evils of the world. Trans- humanism considers humans inferior to smart machines (AI systems) or humans heavily integrated with technology, which it places as the next step of development in the evolutionary myth which dominates the thinking of the modern man for a long time. As has already occurred with Bolshevism and liberal democracy, climate utopia will probably turn into dystopia very quickly, but this time it might result in greatest depopulation world has seen in it’s current cycle. Climate change deniers interpret climate action as an attack on their consumer-bourgeois lifestyle and point out that climate change is a hoax which should be resisted, but even if it is a hoax, since consumer-bourgeois man reached zero point, this is irrelevant. It is better to perform Great Reset which everybody need under some hoax, whatever it’s contents are, than to tell people the real truth, which they won’t be able to handle.

Noble race of Nordico-Aryan origin which ruled Europe for 1000 years was seriously eco-conscious in an organic way, without even knowing there is such a thing as ecology. This was probably also the case with noble races of the Roman, Persian, Greek or some other cycles in which they were the ones who ruled. It is interesting that the sequence of revolutions from bellow, or from the peasant and proletarian masses of pre-Indo- European matriarchal origin, lead to the establishment of the eco-conscious religion of caring about the Mother Earth. Hundred years of freedom of the mass man lead to such a destruction of both physical and metaphysical reality, creating a void never seen before, that he is forced at last to adopt it. So in the weird way two diametrically opposed races can come together agreeing, from completely different angles, on the eco question. That means that it is possible to live eco-consciously by living like people lived in earlier phases of the cycle, when noble race ruled. There is no need to “progress” linearly to be eco-conscious - the same is possible by “regressing” or progressing circularly, ending the current cycle and starting the other one anew.

With communism there have been situations in which something began to reach such depths. Quite correctly, a contemporary politician spoke of an inner and deep change that, by manifesting itself in the form of an obsession, is produced in those who truly adhere to communism; their thinking and conduct are altered by it. In my view, it is an alteration or a fundamental contamination of the human being: in such cases it affects the plane of existential reality, which is not what happens with those who react from bourgeois and intellectualist positions. The possibility of revolutionary-conservative action depends essentially on the measure in which the opposing idea, namely the traditional, aristocratic, anti-proletarian idea, is able to reach such existential levels - thereby giving rise to a new realism and allowing Tradition, as a worldview, to give form to a specific type of antibourgeois man as the nucleus of new elites, beyond the crisis of all individualistic and unrealistic values. - Julius Evola