Islamophobia

One of the constant themes of contemporary conservative forces around Europe during the last decade was migrant crisis and it’s consequences, including increased levels of crime committed by migrants coming from the “Muslim” world, and general issues with their integration in the society they migrate to. These events are mostly interpreted as an attack on the so called Western culture, and more generally on European Christian culture at large. There are several related but separate arguments being made. One is religious, second one is racial, where race is conceived in it’s coarsest form, on the level of body and in particular, skin color, and the third one is economic or materialistic.

Fallacy of the religious argument is that migrants are religious men. Reality is that in the same way Christianity have fallen over centuries, so did Islam, all over the world, reaching probably zero point, with Christianity being infinitesimally closer to zero. So migrant is much closer in this regard to the “white man” of the West than he is ready to acknowledge. This is probably primary reason why he started talking about Tradition because he needs to differentiate himself somehow in order to preserve his self-image of dominance, which he imagines, but at the same time denies under the influence of “equality” myth. He will fail in his attempts for differentiation since there is no single differentiating factor of any weight involved. The only “tradition” which the man of the West is related to is the “tradition” of the American Empire which represents the inversion of the Tradition found in the “old world” of the current cycle and other upward cycles of history. This American “tradition” during the last few decades spread all over the world like a virus and despite it’s waning influence due to significant tendencies toward multipolarity in recent years, it still represents the backbone of the monoculture which keeps infecting both men of the West and those of the developing world where migrants mostly come from. In this context the West for migrants represents what it used to represent for men from the Eastern Bloc countries before the fall of the Berlin Wall, which means an opportunity for realization of the utopian dreams drummed into the unwashed masses by politico-media complex, or just an opportunity to live in more humane conditions compared to those in their homeland which due to racial inadequacies of it’s population is unable to lift itself up from chaos, or which got struck by some natural disaster or American crusade, like war on terror.

Racial argument is also deeply flawed. Today’s white man of the West is racially closer to brown, black or yellow man of the “developing” world, not on the level of body, but on the level of soul and spirit, than he is to the noble race which used to rule over Europe. The primary proof, aside from the fact that vast majority of ancestors of the white man were peasants, is that after the dissolution of nobility white man created a world which represents the antithesis of the “old world” which is very similar to what happened elsewhere in the world. The only difference is material one, where white men enjoyed and still enjoys more comfort than his racial sibling in the “developing” world. This racial similarity is confirmed by how easy migrants adapt to the only reality which exists in the West, that of consumerism and wage slavery. Incidents which some of them are prone to have in most cases nothing to do with significant cultural differences, but primarily with disappointment many migrants feel in the West once they realize that it does not really represent a dream land which it is marketed as. Migrants themselves, in many ways like a bourgeois man of the West, are individuals without stable identity, and therefore open to all kinds of utopian ideas, including the one which markets the West as literal heaven on Earth. Eventually large migrant population in the United States and Europe might lead to some kind of crisis which will have characteristics of the civil war, but will differ significantly from civil wars which took place in the last several hundred years. Most of those wars had some kind of higher component where disputes at least partly revolved around some kind of idea, or on the lower level were ideological in nature. In comparison, possible civil war involving migrant population will primarily have materialistic character of basic survival in the environment of scarce material resources, possibly coupled with the irrational component of the supposed responsibility of the white man for all of the problems of the world. In this way various Mad Max scenarios can be imagined where struggle for basic survival takes place without any higher justification. Given that all of the involved parties in those imagined conflicts are racially very similar, it would be more productive for them to be integrated into one system based on some new narrative of worldwide racial brotherhood, which might emerge as the consequence of the Great Reset.

Economic argument focuses on the threat migrants pose to the material well-being of the white man. Migrants are taking jobs which white man “deserves”, they get social benefits which white man is entitled to, etc. All that might be true, but it is the white man of today who reached a point where his only motivation for work is a pay at the end of the month or week. He is the one who contemplated the world where he can have all the comforts without doing any work, so his invention of social benefits, the therapeutic state which takes care of everybody, and bureaucratic structures of all kinds, is now going to be employed against him, because if everybody are equal, why migrants would not be entitled to all those perks he enjoyed for decades. If migrants would be truly aware of the real economic reality of the West, they would think twice about migrating there, despite in many cases grim reality of their homeland. The whole of the West is for decades trying to postpone bankruptcy and it recently started to run out of tricks, so it will soon very likely enter a long era of soft totalitarian regime with it’s lockdowns, mass surveillance and generally situation of scarce material resources. Migrant crisis certainly is not a fully spontaneous phenomenon, in that there are forces which either need low paid workers to make more money or to just make ends meet, forces which need them to realize their multicultural utopia, or those on the higher level which will use it to end the consumer-bourgeois cycle, but it represents the next logical step in the development of the system which white bourgeois man created for his own benefit, not being able to envision second-degree effects.

Migrants moving to the West are imagined as postmodern equivalents of the Ottoman invasions of the Holy Roman Empire during the Middle Ages and early Modern period. This is the most comical analogy one can make, and it confirms just how out of touch with reality today’s white man is. The reality is that forces who clashed during those invasions have very little to do with today’s white man, as they have with migrants. Those forces were racially, especially on the level of spirit very similar, and both ruled today’s white man’s and migrant’s ancestors back then and for centuries before and after that. White man of today represents the antithesis of white man of the “old world”, especially in case of nobility, and especially in the context of his ability to defend himself, his property and community he lives in. In recent decades he adopted suicidal pacifism and became so democratically minded that even recent crises which reveal all of the weaknesses of this perspective, were not able to push him into changing his mind. Given his passivity and inability to fight for anything which does not involve his wallet, there is no need for migrants to occupy Europe with arms, which they are almost equally not able to do. It is enough for politico-media complex to gradually instantiate a new normal where significant migrant populations throughout Europe is regarded as positive phenomena despite all it’s negative consequences for the native population. It seems like a white man of today is not even able to differentiate between the positive and negative since they are increasingly fluid categories which are assigned to various phenomena depending on how that fits the interest of the politico-media complex. In any case, he will certainly continue to fight for his wallet which probably represents the only real thing he thinks he can count on, but the Great Reset might very soon put this assumption into question.

As far as the Western doctrine of the “holy war” is concerned, I will refer here only to the Crusades. The fact that during the Crusades men who fought the war intensely and experienced it according to the same spiritual meaning were found on both sides demonstrates the true unity between people who shared the same traditional spirit; a unity that can be preserved not only through differences of opinion but also through the most dramatic contrasts. In their rising up in arms against each other, Islam and Christianity gave witness to the unity of the traditional spirit. - Julius Evola